MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955157619 · doi:10.3917/dev.192.0125

Récits d’enfants sur leur constellation familiale : les liens relationnels au sein des familles lesboparentales avec donneur connu au Québec

2019· article· fr· W2955157619 on OpenAlexaffabout
Isabel Côté, Renée-Pier Trottier-Cyr, Kévin Lavoie, Geneviève Pagé, Diane Dubeau

Bibliographic record

VenueDevenir · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMedicine
TopicReproductive Health and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec en OutaouaisUniversité du Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article présente les résultats d’une étude québécoise portant sur les constellations familiales de vingt et un enfants de mères lesbiennes conçus grâce au sperme d’un donneur connu, ainsi que des enfants de ces hommes. L’objectif est de comprendre les représentations de la famille et des liens de parenté qu’ont ces enfants. La méthodologie déployée s’appuie principalement sur une cartographie circulaire comme outil d’analyse sensible, permettant aux enfants d’identifier les personnes faisant partie de leur vie. Les résultats montrent que les représentations du donneur et sa place dans la constellation familiale varient selon l’enfant, en fonction de son âge, de la terminologie utilisée par ses mères pour désigner le donneur et de l’intégration de l’histoire de sa venue au monde.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.147
Threshold uncertainty score0.296

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0090.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.298
Teacher spread0.246 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations11
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDevenirSame topicReproductive Health and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207