MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Phase II randomized study of the EGFR, HER2, HER3 signaling inhibitor AZD8931 in combination with anastrozole (A) in women with endocrine therapy (ET) naive advanced breast cancer (MINT).

2013· article· en· W2955160320 on OpenAlexaff
Stephen Johnston, Mark Basik, Roberto Hegg, Wirote Lausoontornsiri, Lukasz Grzeda, Mark Clemons, Lydia Dreosti, Serban Ghiorghiu, Helen Mann, Dónal Landers, Mary Stuart, Massimo Cristofanilli

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Oncology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAdvanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Canadian institutionsOttawa HospitalJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnastrozoleInternal medicineClinical endpointBreast cancerPopulationInterim analysisOncologyPlaceboCancerGastroenterologyRandomized controlled trialTamoxifenPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

531 Background: Preclinical data suggest a key role for EGFR inhibition in delaying acquired resistance to ET in ER+ breast cancer (BC). Retrospective analyses of 2 Phase II studies suggested adding gefitinib to ET delayed PFS in ET naive (ETN) BC. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multi-center study (NCT01151215) was conducted to prospectively test the hypothesis that adding AZD8931, an inhibitor of EGFR, HER2 and HER3 signaling, to A would be beneficial in delaying endocrine resistance in an advanced ETN BC population. Methods: Post-menopausal women with ER+ and/or PR+, ETN, HER2-negative, advanced BC were randomized (1:1:1) to receive A (1 mg od) plus AZD8931 20 or 40 mg bd or placebo (P). The primary endpoint was PFS (ITT population). Data presented are from an interim analysis (data cutoff 31 Aug 2012; 39% pts had a progression event). Results: Between Jun 2010 and Jun 2012, 359 pts (median age 61 years) were randomized to A combined with AZD8931 20 mg (n=118), 40 mg (n=120) or P (n=121). At the interim analysis, median PFS in the AZD8931 20 mg, 40 mg and P arms was 10.9, 13.8 and 14.0 months, respectively; PFS HR (95% CI) for AZD8931 20 mg:P was 1.37 (0.91–2.06, P=0.135) and for AZD8931 40 mg:P was 1.16 (0.77–1.75, P=0.485). Deaths were reported for 20 (17%), 16 (13%) and 12 pts (10%) in the AZD8931 20 mg, 40 mg and P arms, respectively. Grade ≥3 AEs were reported for 22 (19%), 44 (37%) and 18 (15%) pts in the AZD8931 20 mg, 40 mg, and P arms, respectively, the most frequent being rash (0% vs 8% vs 2%), acneiform dermatitis (0% vs 7% vs 0%) and hypertension (3% vs 3% vs 2%). Serious AEs were reported for 12%, 14% and 9% pts in the AZD8931 20 mg, 40 mg and P arms, respectively, and discontinuation (of AZD8931 or P) due to an AE in 5%, 8% and 2% pts, respectively. Conclusions: Co-blockade of EGFR, HER2, HER3 in combination with aromatase inhibition does not appear to delay endocrine resistance to ETN BC. Based on the low probability of demonstrating superior efficacy with addition of AZD8931 to A and the overall risk/benefit, the study was closed at the recommendation of the IDMC and pts discontinued AZD8931. Clinical trial information: NCT01151215.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0030.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.415
Teacher spread0.384 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical OncologySame topicAdvanced Breast Cancer TherapiesFrench-language works237,207