Vibration Analysis of Magneto-Electro-Thermo NanoBeam Resting on Nonlinear Elastic Foundation Using Sinc and Discrete Singular Convolution Differential Quadrature Method
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Magneto-Electro-Thermo nanobeam resting on a nonlinear elastic foundation is presented. This beam is subjected to the external electric voltage and magnetic potential, mechanical potential and temperature change. Also, we added the new material PTZ-5H-COFe2O4. The governing equations and boundary conditions are derived using Hamilton principle. These equations are discretized by using three differential quadrature methods and iterative quadrature technique to determine the natural frequencies and mode shapes. Numerical analysis is introduced to explain the influence of computational characteristics of the proposed schemes on convergence, accuracy and efficiency of the obtained results. The obtained results agreed with the previous analytical and numerical ones. A detailed parametric study is conducted to investigate the influences of different boundary conditions, various composite materials, nonlinear elastic foundation, nonlocal parameter, the length-to-thickness ratio, external electric and magnetic potentials, axial forces, temperature and their effects on the vibration characteristics of Magneto-Electro-Thermo-Elastic nanobeam.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it