MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2955196704 · doi:10.21037/jtd.2019.06.54

On the ‘cusp’ of clinical feasibility: aortic wall shear stress derived non-invasively with 4D flow MRI

2019· letter· en· W2955196704 on OpenAlexaff
Émilie Bollache, Paul W.M. Fedak, Michael Markl, Alex J. Barker

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Thoracic Disease · 2019
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of CalgaryLibin Cardiovascular Institute of Alberta
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsMedicineShear stressCusp (singularity)CardiologyShear (geology)Internal medicineRadiologyGeologyComposite materialMaterials scienceGeometryMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is with great interest that we read the expert commentary by Carelli et al . regarding our recent study in their Editorial entitled “Is wall shear stress ready to become a prime-time clinical tool?—measurement of post-surgical patterns in patients undergoing aortic valve and thoracic aortic replacement using 4-dimensional flow magnetic resonance imaging” (1). We agree with the authors that basic wall shear stress (WSS) measurements are on the cusp of clinical feasibility. We also agree that additional technical developments remain to occur in order to enable more sophisticated, time-resolved WSS measurements—and we continue to work diligently to make these available to the wider community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.023
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.023
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0340.024
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.407
Teacher spread0.362 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Thoracic Disease→Same topicCardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments→French-language works237,207→