MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955263631 · doi:10.1177/0037549719857137

Proxy models for evaluation of permeability, three-phase relative permeability, and capillary pressure curves from rate-transient data

2019· article· en· W2955263631 on OpenAlexaff
Zhenzihao Zhang, Turgay Ertekin

Bibliographic record

VenueSIMULATION · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPetrophysicsCoringCapillary pressureSaturation (graph theory)Relative permeabilityPetroleum engineeringPermeability (electromagnetism)Multiphase flowWirelineDimensionless quantityGeologyMechanicsSoil scienceGeotechnical engineeringPorous mediumMaterials sciencePorosityMathematicsEngineeringChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study developed a data-driven forecasting tool that predicts petrophysical properties from rate-transient data. Traditional estimations of petrophysical properties, such as relative permeability (RP) and capillary pressure (CP), strongly rely on coring and laboratory measurements. Coring and laboratory measurements are typically conducted only in a small fraction of wells. To contend with this constraint, in this study, we develop artificial neural network (ANN)-based tools that predict the three-phase RP relationship, CP relationship, and formation permeability in the horizontal and vertical directions using the production rate and pressure data for black-oil reservoirs. Petrophysical properties are related to rate-transient data as they govern the fluid flow in oil/gas reservoirs. An ANN has been proven capable of mimicking any functional relationship with a finite number of discontinuities. To generate an ANN representing the functional relationship between rate-transient data and petrophysical properties, an ANN structure pool is first generated and trained. Cases covering a wide spectrum of properties are then generated and put into training. Training of ANNs in the pool and comparisons among their performance yield the desired ANN structure that performs the most effectively among the ANNs in the pool. The developed tool is validated with blind tests and a synthetic field case. Reasonable predictions for the field cases are obtained. Within a fraction of second, the developed ANNs infer accurate characteristics of RP and CP for three phases as well as residual saturation, critical gas saturation, connate water saturation, and horizontal permeability with a small margin of error. The predicted RP and CP relationship can be generated and applied in history matching and reservoir modeling. Moreover, this tool can spare coring expenses and prolonged experiments in most of the field analysis. The developed ANNs predict the characteristics of three-phase RP and CP data, connate water saturation, residual oil saturation, and critical gas saturation using rate-transient data. For cases fulfilling the requirement of the tool, the proposed technique improves reservoir description while reducing expenses and time associated with coring and laboratory experiments at the same time.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.085
GPT teacher head0.367
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIMULATIONSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207