Large-scale noise-resilient evolution-strategies
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ranking-based Evolution Strategies (ES) are efficient algorithms for problems where gradient-information is not available or when the gradient is not informative. This makes ES interesting for Reinforcement-Learning (RL). However, in RL the high dimensionality of the search-space, as well as the noise of the simulations make direct adaptation of ES challenging. Noise makes ranking points difficult and a large budget of re-evaluations is needed to maintain a bounded error rate. In this work, the ranked weighting is replaced by a linear weighting function, which results in nearly unbiased stochastic gradient descent (SGD) on the manifold of probability distributions. The approach is theoretically analysed and the algorithm is adapted based on the results of the analysis. It is shown that in the limit of infinite dimensions, the algorithm becomes invariant to smooth monotonous transformations of the objective function. Further, drawing on the theory of SGD, an adaptation of the learning-rates based on the noise-level is proposed at the cost of a second evaluation for every sampled point. It is shown empirically that the proposed method improves on simple ES using Cumulative Step-size Adaptation and ranking. Further, it is shown that the proposed algorithm is more noise-resilient than a ranking-based approach.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it