Span-wise coherence of fluctuating forces on twin bridge decks and the turbulence effect
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Unlike the adequate researches on a single-box girder, the understanding of span-wise force correlation on twin decks is limited. A sectional model pressure testing of a widely slotted twin-box girder has been carried out in the background of a 5000-m-long bridge. Three grid configurations separated the effect of turbulence intensity and integral scale. Seven test sections were set on the model with totally 532 pressure taps. After the correction of pressure distortion, the correlation coefficients and integral scales of forces were compared on the leeward and the windward decks. Root coherence of lift was analyzed in detail at several separation distances. Pressure signals were used to explain why force coherence is stronger than flow and why “low frequency curve” phenomenon occurs. Considering the shortage of existing expressions, a simple but efficient form was proposed which can fit the coherence on the leeward, the windward, and the whole decks. The parameters in different flows can be reconstructed by linear functions which benefits new model’s application. In the final, the influences of turbulence intensity and integral scale on force coherence were illustrated.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it