MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955435850

Feasibility Study of Lean Oil Sand as Base and Surface Material on Gravel Roads in Alberta

2019· dissertation· en· W2955435850 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Zhou Bing-qian

Bibliographic record

VenueUWSpace (University of Waterloo) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAsphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBase (topology)Mining engineeringGeotechnical engineeringGeologyCivil engineeringEngineeringGeographyEnvironmental scienceMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A major concern has been raised by Imperial Oil Inc. that dust issues extensively occurred on the gravel roads in Kearl Lake Oil Sand site in northern Alberta, Canada. Some mitigation measures had been utilized to minimize the dust. Preliminary results showed that the dust has been well controlled by applying Lean Oil Sand (LOS)-granular mixtures.
\nA site survey has been conducted by the Centre for Pavement and Transportation Technology (CPATT) at University of Waterloo and Imperial Oil Inc. to assess the conditions of selected gravel roads at Kearl Lake site. Recommendations on road maintenance have been provided based on the findings through visual inspection, discussions with site personnel, and physical testing at the site.
\nThe effectiveness of preliminary application of LOS on the gravel roads at Kearl Lake site prompted further research on the feasibility of applying LOS as surface or base material in gravel road design. A suite of laboratory tests, including moisture content test, extraction test, gradation test, proctor test and California bearing ratio test, have been designed and conducted at CPATT to evaluate the mechanical properties of LOS-granular mixture samples with three different mixing ratios. The results show that the bitumen content of LOS provided by Imperial was found in a range of 3-4.5% by weight which can be defined as low graded oil sand. The pure LOS and the 30% granular and 70% LOS mixture are only suitable for sub-base materials. The granular material used on site, 50% granular and 50% LOS mixture, and 70% granular and 30% LOS mixture are applicable for both base and sub-base materials. However, none of these materials are suitable for surfacing material due to lack of fine aggregates. The CBR values of the granular-LOS mixtures are mainly dependent on the granular percentage. Higher granular content generally results in a higher CBR value.
\nPavement structural thickness design analysis has been performed considering the introduction of LOS. The AASHTO design chart method is converted into an equation-based method using digitization and regression analyses. A parametric study showed that for gravel roads that require high performance, LOS can be used as a binding agent and mixed with granular materials for mitigating the dust effect. A low mixing percentage of LOS such as the 70% granular and 30% LOS mixture should be used in this case to maintain the strength of base layer. For gravel roads which require a relatively lower performance, a higher amount of LOS may be applied into the mixture with granular materials. In this situation, the introduction of LOS can both save the cost of granular materials and mitigate the dust effect.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.283
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueUWSpace (University of Waterloo)Same topicAsphalt Pavement Performance EvaluationFrench-language works237,207