MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Exercise Prescription Based on a Six Minute Walk Test in Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Survivors

2019· article· en· W2955583131 on OpenAlexaff
Gabrielle E. Duhamel, Maxime Caru, Valerie LeMay, Simon Drouin, Nathalie Alos, Laurence Bertout, Maja Krajinović, Caroline Laverdière, Marie‐Josée Raboisson, Daniel Sinnett, Gregoir Andelfinger, Daniel Curnier

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Canadian institutionsCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCardiorespiratory fitnessMedicineExercise prescriptionPhysical therapyTest (biology)Heart rateIntensity (physics)Medical prescriptionInternal medicineBlood pressure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Advance in cancer treatment induced drastic improvements in survival rate of Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) for pediatric patients. These medical advancements came at the cost of cardiac dysfunction. Regular physical activity (PA) has been known to have a preventive effect on these health issues. Previous studies have shown that survivors are less active than their peers and below the recommended PA guidelines. The aim of this study is to evaluate the intensity measured from the Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) comparatively to maximal exercise test and verified if it is compatible with standard recommendations. METHODS:We tested 177 ALL survivors. We used a 6MWT and a cardiopulmonary exercise test (VO2max). Classification of risk level factors was based on treatment dosage, age at diagnosis, sex, prognostic risk group, time from the end of the treatment (Standard Risk (SR) and High Risk (HR)). Participants were divided in two groups according to their median cardiorespiratory fitness level (<84.3% vs ≥84.3) RESULTS: Mean survivors age was 22.27±6.30. The survivors included had 44.6% SR and 55.4% HR factors. The mean VO2max.measured was significantly lower than the one predicted; 85.8%±16.5. The heart rate measured at the end of the walk represents a mean of 75.8% of the maximal predicted. The mean intensity measured at the end of the walk test was 60.4%±17.9 of the VO2max. There is no significant difference between low and high cardiorespiratory fitness level of relative exercise intensity during the 6MWT (p=0.609). We observe a trending difference in relative exercise intensity during the 6MWT depending on risk factors (SR=63.3%±17.0 vs HR=58.1%±18.4; p=0.051). CONCLUSIONS:Although the physical cardiorespiratory fitness of survivors is lower, our results demonstrate that with a self-pace exercise (i.e. 6MWT) participants reached similar level as those of a healthy population. Their physical fitness level does not impact the relative intensity levels measured during the 6MWT. Criteria link to the disease (ALL risk prognostic: SR and HR) needs to be considered while prescribing PA to this population. Survivors have greater chances of overcoming their disease than in past history, but specific and increased knowledge about physical activity is needed to prevent late-effects related to the treatments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life→French-language works237,207→