MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2955588950 · doi:10.22215/etd/2019-13602

In the Presence of Ghosts: Saskatchewan's Abandoned Landscape

2019· dissertation· en· W2955588950 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Gina Rehbein

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImmigrationGovernment (linguistics)GeographyRestructuringEconomic interventionismPopulationIntervention (counseling)Political scienceEconomyHistoryEconomic growthDevelopment economicsArchaeologySociologyDemographyLawEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Drawn in by optimistic government campaigns, thousands of immigrants hopeful of the promised benefits of prairie living quickly sprawled across what would shortly become known as Saskatchewan. Rail lines stretched in every direction and villages began to sprout up every ten kilometers along the way. Within only a few decades however, the growth quickly turned into despair; years of widespread drought, the Great Depression, and land restructuring forced many to flee, leaving behind vacant homes and little hope for the few who stayed. Half a century later, the continuous decline in rural population has led to over 300 of these towns to now be considered "ghost towns," that are gradually becoming more invisible. With no likely intervention in sight, these fragments of our immigrant heritage will be all but invisible for the next generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.097
Threshold uncertainty score0.236

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0290.012
Scholarly communication0.0080.003
Open science0.0020.006
Research integrity0.0010.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCanadian Identity and History→French-language works237,207→