MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955628871 · doi:10.1137/18m1201020

A Model for Megakaryopoiesis with State-Dependent Delay

2019· article· en· W2955628871 on OpenAlexafffund
Boullu Loïs, Laurent Pujo-Menjouet

Bibliographic record

VenueSIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicPlatelet Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsYork UniversityUniversité de Montréal
FundersUniversité de LyonNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMitacsAgence Nationale de la Recherche
KeywordsMathematicsDelay differential equationUniquenessTranscendental equationDifferential equationThrombopoietinPopulationLinearizationConstant (computer programming)Mathematical analysisSteady state (chemistry)Applied mathematicsStability (learning theory)Control theory (sociology)Nonlinear systemPhysicsChemistryComputer scienceHaematopoiesisBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We analyze the stability of a system of differential equations with a threshold-defined delay arising from a model for platelet production. We consider a maturity-structured population of megakaryocyte progenitors and an age-structured population of platelets, where the cytokine thrombopoietin (TPO) increases the maturation rate of progenitors. Using the quasi-steady-state approximation for TPO dynamics and the method of characteristics, partial differential equations are reduced to a system of two differential equations with a state-dependent delay accounting for the variable maturation rate. We start by introducing the model and proving the positivity and boundedness of the solutions. Then we use a change of variables to obtain an equivalent system of two differential equations with a constant delay, from which we prove existence and uniqueness of the solution. As linearization around the unique positive steady state yields a transcendental characteristic equation of third degree, we introduce the main result, a new framework for stability analysis on models with fixed delays. This framework is then used to describe the stability of the megakaryopoiesis with respect to its parameters. Finally, with parameters being obtained and estimated from data, we give an example in which oscillations appear when the death rate of progenitors is increased 10-fold.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.420
Threshold uncertainty score0.524

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSIAM Journal on Applied MathematicsSame topicPlatelet Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207