Optimizing process parameters to increase the quality of the output in a separator : An application of Deep Kernel Learning in combination with the Basin-hopping optimizer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Achieving optimal efficiency of production in the industrial sector is a process that is continuously under development. In several industrial installations separators, produced by Alfa Laval, may be found, and therefore it is of interest to make these separators operate more efficiently. The separator that is investigated separates impurities and water from crude oil. The separation performance is partially affected by the settings of process parameters. In this thesis it is investigated whether optimal or near optimal process parametersettings, which minimize the water content in the output, can be obtained.Furthermore, it is also investigated if these settings of a session can be testedto conclude about their suitability for the separator. The data that is usedin this investigation originates from sensors of a factory-installed separator.It consists of five variables which are related to the water content in theoutput. Two additional variables, related to time, are created to enforce thisrelationship. Using this data, optimal or near optimal process parameter settings may be found with an optimization technique. For this procedure, a Gaussian Process with the Deep Kernel Learning extension (GP-DKL) is used to model the relationship between the water content and the sensor data. Three models with different kernel functions are evaluated and the GP-DKL with a Spectral Mixture kernel is demonstrated to be the most suitable option. This combination is used as the objective function in a Basin-hopping optimizer, resulting in settings which correspond to a lower water content.Thus, it is concluded that optimal or near optimal settings can be obtained. Furthermore, the process parameter settings of a session can be tested by utilizing the Bayesian properties of the GP-DKL model. However, due to large posterior variance of the model, it can not be determined if the process parameter settings are suitable for the separator.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".