MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955734110 · doi:10.1109/dsw.2019.8755562

Long-Range Dependence Parameter Estimation For Mixed Spectra Gaussian Processes

2019· article· en· W2955734110 on OpenAlexaff
Lenin Arango-Castillo, Glen Takahara

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicSpectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRange (aeronautics)GaussianStatistical physicsGaussian processSpectral lineEstimationComputer scienceEstimation theoryAlgorithmPhysicsMaterials scienceEngineeringQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an algorithm to estimate the Hurst parameter, H, in processes with mixed spectra. We focus on the two most studied Gaussian Long-Range Dependent (GLRD) processes: fractional Gaussian noise, fGn(H), and fractional integrated, FI(H), with Gaussian innovations. Our method consists in the decomposition of signal and noise components of the processes under analysis: first, we use harmonic analysis for detection of line components; second, we remove the line components mixed with the GLRD using information from their amplitudes iteratively; and finally, we use a robust method for the estimation of the LRD parameter, H. We apply the method to synthetic periodic time series, and numerical results are presented. The technique is applied to stock-market trading volume time series.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.775
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSpectroscopy and Chemometric AnalysesFrench-language works237,207