The Effect of Distress Tolerance Education on Emotional Regulation and Improvement of Alexithymia in Patients with Masturbation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Masturbation is a complement to sexual desire that does not require a sexual partner and increases suddenly due to hormonal changes in adolescence. The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of distress tolerance training on alexithymia, emotional regulation, and distress tolerance in 11-14 year-old subjects with masturbation. Method: In a case study of multiple baseline type, the 8-hour treatment process was performed on four subjects. Four outpatient with masturbation were evaluated by Toronto alexithymia scale (TAS-20) (Toronto, 2005), cognitive emotion regulation questionnaire (Garnowski et al., 2001) and tolerance of emotional distress (Alawi, 2011) before, during, and after the therapy. The percent recovery was used to measure the recovery rate. Results: Results showed that distress tolerance training was effective in improving alexithymia and increasing emotional regulation and tolerance of distress. The rate of recovery was 44.48% for alexithymia, 29.50% for emotional regulation, and 39.38% for emotional distress.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it