Sugarcane Family Selection and Genetic Parameter Prediction via the REML/BLUP Methodology
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Most sugarcane breeding programs tend to evaluate low heritability characteristics during the initial stages of genotype selection. Thus, family selection has been recently preferred. In this context, the aim of the present study was to select the best family among 78 sugarcane families, as well as estimate genetic values through the mixed models of restricted-maximum likelihood and best non-bias predictor (REML/BLUP) methodology, originating from the República Brasil 2005 (RB05) series. This strategy was deemed efficient, and 34 to 38 families were chosen from four evaluated characteristics underexplored by genetic researchers such as total plot mass (MTT), mean mass of one tiller in the plot (M1C), stature (EST), and mean number of canes per square meter (NCM). The family increments ranging from 6.02 to 82.11%, in the next genetic culture improvement program selection phases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it