MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955833940 · doi:10.1117/12.2523459

Graduate programs in biophotonics: unique transdisciplinary training in applied photonics for the life sciences

2019· article· en· W2955833940 on OpenAlexaffabout
Andréanne Deschênes, Flavie Lavoie‐Cardinal, Mario Méthot, Paul De Koninck

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical Research
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBiophotonicsMultidisciplinary approachGraduate studentsPhotonicsBiological sciencesVariety (cybernetics)Training (meteorology)Engineering ethicsEngineering physicsMedical educationEngineeringPhysicsComputer scienceMedicineSociologyBiologyBiotechnologyArtificial intelligenceOptoelectronicsSocial science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 2008, Université Laval launched the first and only graduate programs in biophotonics in Canada. This initiative is dedicated to the training of a new generation of highly qualified researchers at the interface of life sciences and optics. It also stemmed from the strong expertise of the University in optics/photonics, its major investments in state-of-the art biophotonics infrastructure and technologies, and its desire to promote multidisciplinary training of graduate students. The programs are hosted by the Faculty of Science and Engineering in collaboration with the Faculty of Medicine, regrouping professors from 3 Faculties and 10 departments at Université Laval. The biophotonics graduate programs offer students from a wide variety of scientific backgrounds the opportunity to train in highly skilled research teams on projects that bridge the gap between traditional research fields. They benefit from transdisciplinary training opportunities in the fields of physics, chemistry, biology, biochemistry, neurosciences, medicine, engineering and ethics.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.031
Threshold uncertainty score0.102

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.003
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0020.012
Research integrity0.0020.006
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0310.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.084
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGenetics, Bioinformatics, and Biomedical ResearchFrench-language works237,207