THE BENEFIT ASPECTS FROM INTERNATIONAL EXPERIMENTS IN HEALTH INSURANCE SERVICE IN EGYPT
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is doubt that concerning with health aspects and presenting health care for any society has its own reflections on its individuals' productive part, contributing in turn in achieving more positive economic outcomes. Consequently, this study attempts to examine some successful states' experiments in field of health care services in Egypt. So, this study drives at benefitting from these states' experiments in the health insurance service, particularly, the medical service itself and resources of funding of this service. The study sets a proposed framework for benefitting from the various international states' experiments in the health insurance service in Egypt, particularly, with the issue of the new law health insurance that has started to be applied on some governorates in Egypt. Regarding these experiments of other states which have different aspects to make use of such as the British experiment, the Japanese experiment, and the Canadian, Corian and Indian experiment. The researchers count on international reports published on the internet. The study comes to the necessity for increasing the role of the private sector and full-time physicians who work in public hospitals and setting plans and special policies for development of health services. Recommendations: Variation of funding resources to expend on health and increase contribution of the private sector and the society's civil organizations. Establishing a union for pricing medications and distribute them to hospitals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".