Bibliographic record
Abstract
In the second quarter of the 17th c. Blois as one of the largest artistic centers of France becomes the focus of a unique and organic combination of enamel art and horology. Thus, the problem of the formation and evolution of watchmaking in Blois touches upon the question of the development of French enamel in the 16th–17th cc. Furthermore, the school of Blois infl uenced deeply the evolution of world horology in succeeding years aft er its prosperity has been cut off by the mass emigration of the Protestant watchmakers and jewelers to the Netherlands, England and Switzerland. Th erefore, the unique artistic technique of the school will change the philosophy of horological design outside France and will determine the origins of horology. Watches became a mandatory attribute of authority as a luxury object of the fi nest quality. In the same time chronometer turned to an essential part of costume. As appears, the watch as an accessory formed the appearance of a person of the day and became some sort of a compass of fashion trends in the 17th – 18th cc.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".