MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955907517 · doi:10.1144/petgeo2018-159

Numerical local upscaling of elastic geomechanical properties for heterogeneous continua

2019· article· en· W2955907517 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenuePetroleum Geoscience · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Mathematical Modeling in Engineering
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsGeologyGeomechanicsMetamorphic petrologyHydrogeologyTelmatologyEnvironmental geologyGemologyIgneous petrologyEngineering geologyGeotechnical engineeringPetrologyGeobiologyRegional geologyGeophysicsVolcanismSeismologyTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An efficient, numerical local upscaling technique for estimating elastic geomechanical properties in heterogeneous continua is proposed. The upscaled anisotropic elastic properties are solved locally with various boundary conditions and reproduce the anisotropic geomechanical response of fine-scale simulations of sand–shale sequence models with horizontal and inclined shale bedding planes. The algorithm is automated in a parallel program and can be used to determine optimum upscaling ratios in different regions of the reservoir. The successful application of the proposed upscaling method in a field-scale coupled reservoir–geomechanics simulation demonstrates an improvement in overall computational efficiency while maintaining accuracy in the geomechanical response and reservoir performance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.560

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it