MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2955917745 · doi:10.3390/w11071324

Numerical Runout Modeling Analysis of the Loess Landslide at Yining, Xinjiang, China

2019· article· en· W2955917745 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Longwei Yang, Yunjie Wei, Wenpei Wang, Sainan Zhu

Bibliographic record

VenueWater · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicLandslides and related hazards
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersUniversity of Science and Technology of ChinaNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaChina Geological SurveyNorthwest UniversityChinese Academy of Sciences
KeywordsLandslideLoessGeologyDebris flowGeotechnical engineeringMass movementHazardRheologyDebrisLoess plateauMining engineeringGeomorphologySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Panjinbulake loess landslide is located in the western part of the Loess Plateau, in Yining County, Xinjiang, China. It is characterized by its long runout and rapid speed. Based on a field geological survey and laboratory test data, we used the DAN-W dynamic numerical simulation software (Dynamic Analysis Of Landslides, Release 10, O. Hungr Geotechnical Research Inc., West Vancouver, BC, Canada) and multiple sets of rheological models to simulate the whole process of landslide movement. The best rheological groups of the features of the loess landslide process were obtained by applying the Voellmy rheological model in the debris flow area and applying the Frictional rheological model in the sliding source area and accumulation area. We calculated motion features indicating that the landslide movement duration was 22 s, the maximum movement speed was 20.5 m/s, and the average thickness of the accumulation body reached 5.5 m. The total accumulation volume, the initial slide volume and the long runout distance were consistent with the actual situation. In addition, the potential secondary disaster was evaluated. The results show that the DAN-W software and related model parameters can accurately simulate and predict the dynamic hazardous effects of high-speed and long runout landslides. Together, these predictions could help local authorities make the best hazard reduction measures and to promote local development.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.385
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.192
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWaterSame topicLandslides and related hazardsFrench-language works237,207