MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W295593689 · doi:10.4000/osp.3881

Impact croisé du sexe et du niveau scolaire sur les intérêts professionnels d’écoliers suisses

2012· article· fr· W295593689 on OpenAlexaff
Sophie Perdrix, Jérôme Rossier, Fabrizio Butera

Bibliographic record

VenueL’Orientation scolaire et professionnelle · 2012
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCareer Development and Diversity
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article traite de la manière dont le développement des aspirations professionnelles contribue à la formation d’inégalités entre hommes et femmes sur le marché du travail au travers d’une étude empirique portant sur l’influence du sexe et de la filière scolaire sur les intérêts professionnels d’écoliers suisses. Les résultats indiquent que le croisement de ces deux variables affecte particulièrement les jeunes filles dans une filière à exigences élémentaires en restreignant doublement les options envisageables. Les moyens d’action pour les conseiller-e-s en orientation afin d’accompagner spécifiquement cette population est discutée.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.070
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.006
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.340
Teacher spread0.297 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueL’Orientation scolaire et professionnelleSame topicCareer Development and DiversityFrench-language works237,207