Where does it hurt? Location of pain, psychological distress, and alexithymia among outpatients seeking psychotherapy
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Objectives: Physical pain is prevalent among psychiatric outpatients, yet there has been little research regarding the types of pain reported. The purpose of this study was to survey outpatients seeking psychotherapy regarding pain locations and to examine associations between number of pain locations and psychiatric distress and alexithymia.Methods: Two hundred and seventeen patients were recruited from three Canadian hospitals that offer outpatient psychiatry services and short-term therapies. Participants were surveyed about their current physical pain using the Brief Pain Inventory. Participants also completed measures of psychiatric distress (Brief Symptom Inventory-18) and alexithymia (Toronto Alexithymia Scale-20).Results: The three most commonly reported pain locations were lower back, head, and neck. Findings revealed that anxiety, depression and alexithymia were associated with number of reported pain locations. Specifically, participants with three or more pain locations reported significantly higher depression, anxiety and alexithymia in comparison to those with no pain.Conclusions: Back, head and neck pains are highly prevalent among psychiatric outpatients. Multiple pain sites may reflect higher levels of psychiatric distress and greater impairment in emotional processing among psychiatric outpatients.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".