MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2956043127 · doi:10.3390/rs11131572

Retrieving Leaf Chlorophyll Content by Incorporating Variable Leaf Surface Reflectance in the PROSPECT Model

2019· article· en· W2956043127 on OpenAlexaff
Feng Qiu, Jing M. Chen, Holly Croft, Jing Li, Qian Zhang, Yongqin Zhang, Weimin Ju

Bibliographic record

VenueRemote Sensing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing in Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNanjing UniversityGovernment of Jiangsu ProvinceChina Postdoctoral Science FoundationNatural Science Foundation of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsChlorophyllReflectivityLeaf area indexCanopyCoefficient of determinationEnvironmental scienceRemote sensingChlorophyll aMean squared errorBotanyHorticultureMaterials scienceMathematicsOpticsGeologyBiologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Leaf chlorophyll content plays a vital role in plant photosynthesis. The PROSPECT model has been widely used for retrieving leaf chlorophyll content from remote sensing data over various plant species. However, despite wide variations in leaf surface reflectance across different plant species and environmental conditions, leaf surface reflectance is assumed to be the same for different leaves in the PROSPECT model. This work extends the PROSPECT model by taking into account the variation of leaf surface reflection. In the modified model named PROSPECT-Rsurf, an additional surface layer with a variable refractive index is bounded on the N elementary layers. Leaf surface reflectance (Rs) is characterized by the difference between the refractive indices of leaf surface and interior layers. The specific absorption coefficients of the leaf total chlorophyll and carotenoids were recalibrated using a cross-calibration method and the refractive indices of leaf surface and interior layers were obtained during model inversion. Chlorophyll content (Cab) retrieval and spectral reconstruction in the visible spectral region (VIS, 400–750 nm) were greatly improved using PROSPECT-Rsurf, especially for leaves covered by heavy wax or hard cuticles that lead to high surface reflectance. The root mean square error (RMSE) of chlorophyll estimates decreased from 11.1 µg/cm2 to 8.9 µg/cm2 and the Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) increased from 0.81 to 0.88 (p < 0.01) for broadleaf samples in validation, compared to PROSPECT-5. For needle leaves, r increased from 0.71 to 0.89 (p < 0.01), but systematic overestimation of Cab was found due to the edge effects of needles. After incorporating the edge effects in PROSPECT-Rsurf, the overestimation of Cab was alleviated and its estimation was improved for needle leaves. This study explores the influence of leaf surface reflectance on Cab estimation at the leaf level. By coupling PROSPECT-Rsurf with canopy models, the influence of leaf surface reflectance on canopy reflectance and therefore canopy chlorophyll content retrieval can be investigated across different spatial and temporal scales.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.844
Threshold uncertainty score0.956

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRemote SensingSame topicRemote Sensing in AgricultureFrench-language works237,207