Investigation of the 4th Grade Primary School Students’ Attitudes Towards Reading in the Scope of Different Variables
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, it is aimed to examine the attitudes of fourth grade primary school students towards reading in terms ofdifferent variables. In this context, the attitudes of students' reading attitudes were examined according to gender, age,read books regulary and number of books read in a month. The research was prepared in accordance with therelational survey model from the quantitative patterns. The sample of the study consists of 217 primary school fourthgrade students. The data of the study were collected with reading attitude scale prepared by Yurdakal and Susar(2018). Cronbach's Alpha value of the scale is 0.853 and the scale is composed of 4 dimensions and 28 questions.Kruskal Wallis H and Mann Whitney U tests were used to analyze the data. When the results of the research areexamined, the attitudes of the students towards reading do not differ according to gender. Students' attitudes towardsreading varies significantly according to age variable and this significance is in favor of 9-10 years. The students'attitudes towards reading differ with students who do not regularly read books and this is in favor of students who donot read a regular book. The attitudes of students towards reading do not differ according to the number of booksread monthly.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it