Sur les traces de la mémoire seigneuriale au Québec : identité et transmission au sein des familles d’ascendance seigneuriale1
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aboli en 1854, le régime seigneurial a laissé une empreinte considérable dans la province de Québec en perpétuant rentes et propriétés seigneuriales. La relation seigneur/censitaire et le mode de vie seigneurial ont persisté jusque tard au XXe siècle dans bon nombre de communautés. Le présent article s’inscrit dans une recherche sur les persistances seigneuriales dans le Québec contemporain et a pour objectif d’analyser la mémoire seigneuriale. Il émane d’une enquête d’histoire orale menée auprès de familles seigneuriales provenant des quatre coins de la vallée du Saint-Laurent. Il postule l’existence d’une culture familiale distinctive se caractérisant notamment par le maintien de pratiques et d’usages seigneuriaux, d’un rapport d’altérité dans les campagnes québécoises, mais aussi par une mémoire familiale révélant des valeurs seigneuriales portées et transmises par les descendants de ces familles, nobles ou roturières, francophones ou anglophones.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".