MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2956114943 · doi:10.1109/tuffc.2019.2926211

Thin Film PZT-Based PMUT Arrays for Deterministic Particle Manipulation

2019· article· en· W2956114943 on OpenAlexafffund
Christopher Cheng, Ajay Dangi, Liqiang Ren, Sudhanshu Tiwari, Robert R. Benoit, Yongqiang Qiu, Holly S. Lay, Sumit Agrawal, Rudra Pratap, Sri‐Rajasekhar Kothapalli, Thomas E. Mallouk, S. Cochran, Susan Trolier‐McKinstry

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsFujiFilm VisualSonics (Canada)
FundersNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Defense Science and Engineering GraduateSunnybrook Research InstituteNational Science Foundation
KeywordsMaterials sciencePMUTLead zirconate titanatePiezoelectricityUltrasonic sensorAcousticsDiaphragm (acoustics)WaveformMicrofluidicsTransducerSound pressureParticle (ecology)LevitationElectromechanical coupling coefficientVoltageOptoelectronicsDielectricElectrical engineeringComposite materialNanotechnologyFerroelectricityVibrationEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Lead zirconate titanate (PZT)-based piezoelectric micromachined ultrasonic transducers (PMUTs) for particle manipulation applications were designed, fabricated, characterized, and tested. The PMUTs had a diaphragm diameter of 60 μm, a resonant frequency of ~8 MHz, and an operational bandwidth (BW) of 62.5%. Acoustic pressure output in water was 9.5 kPa at 7.5 mm distance from a PMUT element excited with a unipolar waveform at 5 Vpp.The element consisted of 20 diaphragms connected electrically in parallel. Particle trapping of 4 μm silica beads was shown to be possible with 5 Vppunipolar excitation. Trapping of multiple beads by a single element and deterministic control of particles via acoustophoresis without the assistance of microfluidic flow were demonstrated. It was found that the particles move toward diaphragm areas of highest pressure, in agreement with literature and simulations. Unique bead patterns were generated at different driving frequencies and were formed at frequencies up to 60 MHz, much higher than the operational BW. Levitation planes were generated above the 30 MHz driving frequency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics Ferroelectrics and Frequency ControlSame topicMicrofluidic and Bio-sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207