Knowledge management in business and education: Evidence from Vietnam companies and universities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Knowledge Management (KM) is the process of system identification, acquisition and transfer of information and knowledge that people can use to create for perfect competition. KM is considered as an intellectual property of opinions in favour of social orientation and it is created in organizations through social relationships. The definition of KM highlights that it could be considered as closely related to the theory and practice, and is a highly interdisciplinary field of multi-disciplinary. The purpose of this paper is associated with the knowledge management in general and uses survey in Vietnam companies and universities to analysis the role of knowledge management for business development. The authors collected data from 300 companies and universities in Hanoi, Danang, Ho ChiMinh and Can Tho cities. The descriptive statistics, Cronbach Alpha test, Exploratory Factor Analysis, Confirmatory Factor Analysis and Structural Equation Modelling methods were used in this paper. The results indicate that KM had a positive impact on the efficiency of the business organizations. The study also shows that there was a big difference on the effect of KM on organizational effectiveness in terms of SMEs and large enterprises.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".