MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2956429429 · doi:10.1177/0309089218778594

The beginning of chaos for Genesis

2019· article· en· W2956429429 on OpenAlexaff
Marjorie O’Rourke Boyle

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal for the Study of the Old Testament · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicReformation and Early Modern Christianity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsExegesisPhilosophyApologeticsContext (archaeology)CHAOS (operating system)PhilologyOrder (exchange)New TestamentEpistemologyLiteratureTheologySociologyHistoryArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article researches and analyzes the complex and controversial origins of Hermann Gunkel’s influential idea of chaos in Gen 1.2. It identifies his declared source, context, usage, and rationale. It then documents the undeclared but important philological, philosophical, and theological history of chaos. It identifies Gunkel’s thesis of an uncreated chaos as his tacit rejection of Martin Luther’s theology of a created chaos. It details the relevant classical philology and Christian theology involved in Luther’s apologetics against Aristotle’s eternal universe and for Plato’s created universe. It discovers Gunkel’s unacknowledged citation of Plato’s Timaeus as paradigmatic for his own exegesis of Genesis 1 as ‘order from disorder’. It discloses the underlying confrontation of Gunkel’s inclusive religio-historical method with Luther’s theological exclusion of the ancient pagans and their texts from the divine plan of salvation. It invites a more historically informed reevaluation of chaos in Gen 1.2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.597
Threshold uncertainty score0.884

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal for the Study of the Old TestamentSame topicReformation and Early Modern ChristianityFrench-language works237,207