Gas Turbine Condition Monitoring Using Acoustic Emission Signals
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Acoustic emission (AE) signals are recognized as complementary measures for detecting incipient faults and condition monitoring in rotary machinery due to their containment of sources of potential fault energy. However, determining the potential sources of faults cannot be easily realized due to the non-stationarity of AE signals. Available techniques that are capable of evoking instantaneous characteristics of a particular AE signal cannot optimally perform in a sense that there is no guarantee that these characteristics (hereinafter referred to as the “features”) remain constant when another AE signal is obtained from the system, albeit operating under the same machine condition at a different time instant. This paper provides a theoretical framework for developing a highly reliable classification and detection methodology for gas turbine condition monitoring based on AE signals. Mathematical results obtained in this paper are evaluated and validated by using actual gas turbines that are operating in power generating plants, to demonstrate the practicality and simplicity of our methodologies. Emphasis is given to acoustic emissions of similar brand and sized gas turbine turbomachinery under different health conditions and/or aging characteristics.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it