Bag-of-Audio-Words based on Autoencoder Codebook for Continuous Emotion Prediction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper we present a novel approach for extracting a Bag-of-Words (BoW) representation based on a Neural Network codebook. The conventional BoW model is based on a dictionary (codebook) built from elementary representations which are selected randomly or by using a clustering algorithm on a training dataset. A metric is then used to assign unseen elementary representations to the closest dictionary entries in order to produce a histogram. In the proposed approach, an autoencoder (AE) encompasses the role of both the dictionary creation and the assignment metric. The dimension of the encoded layer of the AE corresponds to the size of the dictionary and the output of its neurons represents the assignment metric. Experimental results for the continuous emotion prediction task on the AVEC 2017 audio dataset have shown an improvement of the Concordance Correlation Coefficient (CCC) from 0.225 to 0.322 for arousal dimension and from 0.244 to 0.368 for valence dimension relative to the conventional BoW version implemented in a baseline system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".