MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2957164155 · doi:10.21608/iccee.2018.34666

A Statistical Study on the Parameters Influences the Formation of Starch Nanoparticles through Acid Hydrolysis

2018· article· en· W2957164155 on OpenAlexaff
Fereshteh Bakhtiari, S.S.E.H. Elnashaie, Firoozeh Danafar, Fahimeh Kamali

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Conference on Chemical and Environmental Engineering · 2018
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrolysisStarchNanoparticleAcid hydrolysisChemistryChemical engineeringChromatographyFood scienceBiochemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Starch is a natural, renewable and biodegradable polymer produced by many plants as a source of stored energy. It is the second most abundant biomass material in nature. Starch has a concentric semicrystalline multiscale structure. This structure allows the production of new nano elements through disruption of amorphous domain by acid hydrolysis. Current environmental concerns have turned starch nanoparticles into candidates of growing interest as bio-nanofiller for nanocomposite applications. In this study, the effects of different parameters, while the time of reaction was limited to 1 hr, on starch nano particles formation was investigated. A response surface methodology analysis has been undertaken. The average size of starch nanoparticle obtained in this study was 37.76 nm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.013
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.013
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Conference on Chemical and Environmental EngineeringSame topicAdsorption, diffusion, and thermodynamic properties of materialsFrench-language works237,207