MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

O EROTISMO COMO EXPERIÊNCIA INFINITA, EM GEORGES BATAILLE

2019· article· pt· W2957567554 on OpenAlexaff
Pedro Morais Vasques

Bibliographic record

VenueSapere Aude · 2019
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldPsychology
TopicPsychology and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsDiscovery Air (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Este trabalho investigará o modo como Georges Bataille trata o erotismo e relacionará este com outros tópicos necessários à compreensão de tal temática – tais como o Bem e o Mal, o profano e o sagrado. Para isso, partirá da descrição batailliana da gênese dos mundos e do homem, como escrita em Teoria da religião, a partir da condição animal inicial e através de utilização da ferramenta – tais criações coincidindo com o aparecimento do trabalho e da razão. Depois de esclarecidas todas as anteriormente citadas criações – etapas indispensáveis para o entendimento do erotismo – que compõem o dilema do homem, se debruçará sobre o inevitável sufocamento vivenciado por este na vida ordinária. A partir de então aparecerá a dicotomia entre Bem e Mal, e como, enquanto o Bem oprime, o Mal é experimentado como a libertação das travas criadas pelos tabus, a sustentação da vida humana e corriqueira. A pesquisa sobre o erotismo propriamente dito virá logo em sequência, apontando a essa altura suas especifidades como forma de Mal e como ele se dá em suas diferentes manifestações.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Bem. Erotismo. Indivíduo. Limite. Mal. Profano. Sagrado. ABSTRACTThis work will investigate the manner in which Georges Bataille treats erotism, and it will link that to other topics which are necessary to the understanding of such theme – Good and Evil, the profane and the sacred. In order to do that, it will depart from the Bataillean description of the worlds and the man genesis, as written in the religion Theory, from the initial animal condition and by the utilization of tools – such creations coincided with the appearance of work and reasoning. After clarifying all the previously mentioned creations – indispensable stages for the understanding of erotism – which make up the dilemma of the man, this paper will look over the inevitable suffocation experienced by him in his ordinary life. From that moment on, the Good and Evil dichotomy emerges, and as the Good oppresses, the Evil is experienced as the liberation of the bondages created by taboos, the sustenance of human and everyday life. The research on erotism per se will come right after, pinpointing at this point its specificities in the form of Evil and how it unravels in its manifestations.KEYWORD:Animal. Good. Erotism. Subject. Limit. Evil. Profane. Sacred.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.116
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0600.076

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSapere AudeSame topicPsychology and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207