Bibliographic record
Abstract
Este trabalho investigará o modo como Georges Bataille trata o erotismo e relacionará este com outros tópicos necessários à compreensão de tal temática – tais como o Bem e o Mal, o profano e o sagrado. Para isso, partirá da descrição batailliana da gênese dos mundos e do homem, como escrita em Teoria da religião, a partir da condição animal inicial e através de utilização da ferramenta – tais criações coincidindo com o aparecimento do trabalho e da razão. Depois de esclarecidas todas as anteriormente citadas criações – etapas indispensáveis para o entendimento do erotismo – que compõem o dilema do homem, se debruçará sobre o inevitável sufocamento vivenciado por este na vida ordinária. A partir de então aparecerá a dicotomia entre Bem e Mal, e como, enquanto o Bem oprime, o Mal é experimentado como a libertação das travas criadas pelos tabus, a sustentação da vida humana e corriqueira. A pesquisa sobre o erotismo propriamente dito virá logo em sequência, apontando a essa altura suas especifidades como forma de Mal e como ele se dá em suas diferentes manifestações.PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Bem. Erotismo. Indivíduo. Limite. Mal. Profano. Sagrado. ABSTRACTThis work will investigate the manner in which Georges Bataille treats erotism, and it will link that to other topics which are necessary to the understanding of such theme – Good and Evil, the profane and the sacred. In order to do that, it will depart from the Bataillean description of the worlds and the man genesis, as written in the religion Theory, from the initial animal condition and by the utilization of tools – such creations coincided with the appearance of work and reasoning. After clarifying all the previously mentioned creations – indispensable stages for the understanding of erotism – which make up the dilemma of the man, this paper will look over the inevitable suffocation experienced by him in his ordinary life. From that moment on, the Good and Evil dichotomy emerges, and as the Good oppresses, the Evil is experienced as the liberation of the bondages created by taboos, the sustenance of human and everyday life. The research on erotism per se will come right after, pinpointing at this point its specificities in the form of Evil and how it unravels in its manifestations.KEYWORD:Animal. Good. Erotism. Subject. Limit. Evil. Profane. Sacred.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.023 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".