Short communication: Assessing the accuracy of inline milk fat-to-protein ratio data as an indicator of hyperketonemia in dairy cows in herds with automated milking systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of inline milk fat-to-protein (F:P) data to detect hyperketonemia (HYK) in herds with automated milking systems (AMS). The F:P ratio has been investigated as a tool for detecting HYK with moderate accuracy in past studies, but inline F:P data in AMS may also be useful for HYK screening. To assess the accuracy of these data in commercial settings, we monitored 484 cows from 9 AMS herds for their first 3 wk of lactation, taking blood samples once per week (n = 1,427). Positive cases of HYK were defined by whole-blood β-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) concentrations ≥1.2 or ≥1.4 mmol/L. Milk data were collected from the AMS software on each farm for each cow and converted into 4 different F:P values: (1) value from the same day as the BHB test; (2) 5-d centered-moving average (CMA); (3) 5-d backward-moving average (BMA); (4) 5-d forward-moving average (FMA). In linear regression models, all 4 values were associated with BHB, but slope estimates varied and R 2 were low: same day (slope = 0.95, R 2 = 0.07), CMA (slope = 1.05, R 2 = 0.07), BMA (slope = 0.65, R 2 = 0.04), and FMA (slope = 1.23, R 2 = 0.09). In logistic regression models, the odds of having HYK (BHB ≥1.2 mmol/L) increased with every 0.1-unit increase from the mean F:P ratio (1.16) using same-day values (odds ratio=1.35, 95% confidence interval=1.25–1.47) and CMA (odds ratio=1.39, 95% confidence interval=1.27–1.51). The same increase in F:P from mean BMA (1.14) and FMA (1.17) was associated with 1.22 and 1.49 times the odds of HYK, respectively. For all 4 F:P variations, we evaluated the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of different F:P thresholds with HYK status. As the F:P threshold increased from 1.17 to 1.50, sensitivity decreased (range: 77 to 9%) but specificity increased (range: 58 to 96%). Same-day and CMA F:P cutoffs at which a balance was reached between sensitivity and specificity ranged from 1.18 to 1.22; however, even at these values we found high rates of false positives and negatives (range: 31–39%). These results suggest that inline milk F:P data from inconsistently calibrated sensors should not be used alone to detect HYK in AMS herds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".