MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2957742167

Merce di scambio. I braccianti migranti nell’agricoltura intensiva in Québec/Bargaining chip. Seasonal migrant laborers in intensive agriculture in Québec

2019· article· it· W2957742167 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Lucio Castracani, Jorge Pantaleón

Bibliographic record

VenueCartografie sociali. Rivista di sociologia e scienze umane · 2019
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgriculture and Rural Development Research
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWorkforceFarm workersAgricultureContext (archaeology)EthnographyWork (physics)Migrant workersEconomic shortageImmigrationPolitical scienceEconomic growthBusinessLabour economicsSociologyGeographyEconomicsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since the 1960s, Canadian farms have taken over the workforce from abroad through temporary migration programs. This kind of hiring expanded exponentially in Canadian agriculture over the last 25 years. The article focuses on the daily work experience of seasonal migrant workers in the province of Quebec. Through a relational approach, we identify specific expectations that employers have towards seasonal migrant workers compared to the local workers and placement agencies workers. We highlight how temporary migration programs are not only answers to a labor shortage but also serve to format an ideal figure of agricultural worker to granter the competiveness of the Quebec agriculture economy in the neoliberal context. The article is based on observant participation in four farms and interviews with workers, employers and institutional actors in Quebec, between 2014 and 2017. Keywords: Temporary Foreign Worker Programs; Quebec; Agriculture Production; Workplace; Ethnography.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.146

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0160.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCartografie sociali. Rivista di sociologia e scienze umaneSame topicAgriculture and Rural Development ResearchFrench-language works237,207