Bibliographic record
Abstract
Rising uncertainty in power systems due to ongoing system and operational changes has led to increasing risks in operating a system in a reliable and economic manner. There are growing reliability concerns with the widely used methods, such as the N-1 criterion, to determine operating reserve requirement during unit commitment, and the economic load dispatch method to allocate regulating margin to respond to disturbances. These deterministic methods do not consider the uncertainty or stochastic nature of power systems and are often inadequate to maintain the required operating reliability of modern power systems. This paper introduces a reliability index, designated as the committed generators’ response risk (CGRR) that can be used to maintain a specified level of operating reliability. A probabilistic method to evaluate the CGRR is presented and validated using a Monte Carlo simulation technique. An application of the new index and the methodology is illustrated using the IEEE Reliability Test System. The CGRR provides a comprehensive operating risk measurement of the committed generation until further assistance is available to support the system, and therefore helps operators in decision making for unit commitment and dispatch of the generating units to meet the projected load in the short future time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".