Soft excess in the quiescent Be/X-ray pulsar RX J0812.4–3114
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract We report a 72 ks XMM–Newton observation of the Be/X-ray pulsar (BeXRP) RX J0812.4–3114 in quiescence ($L_X \approx 1.6\times 10^{33}\, \mathrm{erg\, s^{-1}}$). Intriguingly, we find a two-component spectrum, with a hard power-law (Γ ≈ 1.5) and a soft blackbody-like excess below ≈1 keV. The blackbody component is consistent in kT with a prior quiescent Chandra observation reported by Tsygankov et al. and has an inferred blackbody radius of ≈10 km, consistent with emission from the entire neutron star (NS) surface. There is also mild evidence for an absorption line at $\approx 1$ and/or $\approx 1.4\, \mathrm{keV}$. The hard component shows pulsations at P ≈ 31.908 s (pulsed fraction 0.84 ± 0.10), agreeing with the pulse period seen previously in outbursts, but no pulsations were found in the soft excess (pulsed fraction $\lesssim \!31\, {\rm per\, cent}$). We conclude that the pulsed hard component suggests low-level accretion on to the NS poles, while the soft excess seems to originate from the entire NS surface. We speculate that, in quiescence, the source switches between a soft thermal-dominated state (when the propeller effect is at work) and a relatively hard state with low-level accretion, and use the propeller cut-off to estimate the magnetic field of the system to be $\lesssim\! 8.4\times 10^{11}\, \mathrm{G}$. We compare the quiescent thermal LX predicted by the standard deep crustal heating model to our observations and find that RX J0812.4–3114 has a high thermal LX, at or above the prediction for minimum cooling mechanisms. This suggests that RX J0812.4–3114 either contains a relatively low-mass NS with minimum cooling, or that the system may be young enough that the NS has not fully cooled from the supernova explosion.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".