Data-Driven Modeling and UFIR-Based Outlet NO$_{x}$ Estimation for Diesel-Engine SCR Systems
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An accurate and efficient model for selective catalytic reduction (SCR) systems plays an important role in diagnosis and control of diesel-engine after-treatment systems. In this paper, we investigate the data-driven modeling of SCR systems and outlet NOxconcentration estimation based on the developed data-driven model and the algorithm of unbiased finite impulse response (UFIR) filtering. The structure used for the data-driven model is an autoregressive exogenous (ARX) model and the method of partial least square is utilized to identify the parameters of the corresponding ARX model. Moreover, the approach of fuzzy c-means is employed to partition the data and derive multiple local linear models with a better performance on approximating the system nonlinearities. Finally, the algorithm of UFIR filtering is adopted to estimate the outlet NOxconcentration due to its strong robustness without the statistics of process and measurement noises. The performance of proposed approaches on SCR systems is validated with simulations based on experimental data. In addition, comparisons show the improvement of the adopted algorithm on the estimation accuracy.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".