Theoretical estimation of the apparent rate constants for ozone decomposition in gas and aqueous phases using ab initio calculations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An ab initio study, using the coupled cluster calculations (CCSD) method was conducted to investigate the kinetics of the ozone degradation in gas and aqueous phases considering the reaction of ozone with the hydroperoxyl radical. Two potential transition state paths, oxygen and hydrogen transfer, are studied and compared. It was revealed by the ab initio quantum chemical calculations that the calculated overall rate constant in the gas phase differs by approximately an order of magnitude from measured values. However, the calculated selectivity (branching fraction), which was measured directly with isotope studies of hydrogen atom transfer, is almost exactly equal to the experimental value at 298.15 K. The sensitivity analysis showed that adding the reaction between ozone and hydroperoxyl radical to the kinetic model accelerates the decomposition process by more than four times in the aqueous phase (pH = 7–8.5), and for an order of magnitude change in the rate constant of this reaction, the decomposition half‐life changes by 20–45 %. This result might affect our understanding of atmospheric ozone chemistry.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".