Hierarchical and Spiral Polymer Structures: Direct Electrospinning on Porous Anodic Aluminum Oxide Templates
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Electrospun fibers with hierarchical structures have attracted a great deal of attention because they have distinct properties, such as large specific surface areas and high surface area‐to‐volume ratios, and can be applied to various fields. Here, a simple and versatile method is demonstrated to prepare electrospun fibers with hierarchical structures by directly electrospinning poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA) solutions on porous anodic aluminum oxide (AAO) templates. Hierarchical PMMA structures with micro‐ and nanometer scales can be generated. The two length scales of the hierarchical structures can be independently controlled; the first length scale is controlled by the electrospinning conditions, and the second length scale is controlled by the pore sizes of the AAO templates. By adding water in the polymer solutions, the evaporation of the solvents and the whipping instability of the solution jets can be manipulated. Consequently, spiral and hierarchical structures can be obtained. This study opens a promising avenue in fabricating electrospun polymer fibers with hierarchical structures, which should have great potential in a variety of applications, such as filtration, diagnosis, and tissue regeneration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".