MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2957942850 · doi:10.4000/laboreal.1608

Primero de Mayo - trayectoria, dimensiones y sentidos

2019· article· es· W2957942850 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueLaboreal · 2019
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMulticulturalism, Politics, Migration, Gender
Canadian institutionsCegep de Sept Iles
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArtPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Manuscrito recebido em: dezembro/2018Aceite após peritagem: fevereiro/2019 Las celebraciones del Primero de Mayo tienen ya un trayectoria rica y duradera en la historia del trabajo y de los/las trabajadores/as. A lo largo de sus cerca de 130 años, han asumido distintas formas, sentidos y contenidos, internacionalizándose de una manera impresionante. Sin embargo, esto no se produjo de una manera llana y lineal, sin sobresaltos. Toda efeméride, por ser una invención de las tradiciones (Hobsbawm...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.573
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.048
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it