MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2958047115 · doi:10.30799/jespr.171.19050205

Mechanical, Chemical, Structural, and Radiological Changes in Pigeon Bone, Associated with The Dietary Intake of Nickel Recovery Slag

2019· article· en· W2958047115 on OpenAlexaffabout
Eduardo Galiano, Michel Lapointe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Environmental Science and Pollution Research · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNursing
TopicTrace Elements in Health
Canadian institutionsLaurentian University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMaterials scienceMetallurgyEnergy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopySlag (welding)DentistryScanning electron microscopeChemistryMedicineComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Slag from nickel smelting operations in the Sudbury basin in Ontario, Canada, has become ubiquitous. This material rich in heavy metals such as iron, upon ingestion has the potential to effect physical, radiological, chemical, mechanical, and structural changes in biological systems. In this work, we analyzed the effects of slag ingestion through diet, on several quantitative and qualitative parameters of the tibio-tarsal bones in pigeons (Columbia Livia Domestica). The specimens were maintained on a seed diet and divided into a control group (n = 9) provided (normal) clean limestone grit, and an experimental group (n = 9) provided slag-based grit, both for a period of one year. Their tibio-tarsal bones were harvested for analysis. Quantitative analytical methods included conventional density measurements, caliper-based cortical thickness measurements, bone mineral density measurements using Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DEXA), calcium and iron concentration measurements using mass spectrometry, and the determination of Young Moduli and ultimate breaking strength (both in compression) using a universal testing machine (UTM). Qualitative microscopy studies, both optical and electron - including energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) - were carried out for both sample groups. A Welchs t-test (single tail) was used to compare means of the seven quantitative parameters between control and experimental samples; in six of these parameters, a statistically significant difference was found (p ≤ 0.05). Microscopy, both optical and electron - coupled with EDS analysis - revealed structural differences in bone between the two groups. Engineering hardness testing of grit types in the dietary components revealed that the slag ingested by the experimental group was approximately twice as hard (Brinell and Rockwell hardness) as the limestone grit in the control group diet. We conclude that slag ingestion through diet in the species examined, is associated with measurable changes in mechanical, chemical, structural, and radiological properties of the tibio-tarsal bones.<div><br></div>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.939
Threshold uncertainty score0.450

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Environmental Science and Pollution ResearchSame topicTrace Elements in HealthFrench-language works237,207