Clinical and Imaging Evaluation of Efficacy of Viscosupplementation in Degenerative Osteo-arthritis Knee – A Prospective Interventional Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In this study 30 patients with osteo-arthritis (OA) knee (total 55 knees) were given weekly injections of high molecular weight (HMW) hyaluronic acid (HA) for 3 weeks. The subjective parameter was Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Index of Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score which improved from 97.67±21.4 at baseline to 61.03±24.8 at six months follow-up (p=0.0001). Also the mean range of motion (ROM) of the involved knees was 125.73± 10.8 degrees at baseline and it increased to 132.64±5.2 degrees after six months (p=0.0001) of injection treatment. The objective parameter of disease modification was MRI based semi-quantitive Whole-organ Magnetic Resonence Imaging Score (WORMS) score. The mean of total WORMS score in medial femorotibial joint (MFTJ) and patellofemoral joint (PFJ) improved from baseline (28.382±10.446; 22.64±5.969) to final follow up (27.46±10.32; 21.76± 6.182) which was quite significant (p=0.0321; p=0.0294) and implies a reduced rate of cartilage destruction after injection HA though there is no regrowth of cartilage as such.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".