Real-Time Informative Laryngoscopic Frame Classification with Pre-Trained Convolutional Neural Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Visual exploration of the larynx represents a relevant technique for the early diagnosis of laryngeal disorders. However, visualizing an endoscopy for finding abnormalities is a time-consuming process, and for this reason much research has been dedicated to the automatic analysis of endoscopic video data. In this work we address the particular task of discriminating among informative laryngoscopic frames and those that carry insufficient diagnostic information. In the latter case, the goal is also to determine the reason for this lack of information. To this end, we analyze the possibility of training three different state-of-the-art Convolutional Neural Networks, but initializing their weights from configurations that have been previously optimized for solving natural image classification problems. Our findings show that the simplest of these three architectures not only is the most accurate (outperforming previously proposed techniques), but also the fastest and most efficient, with the lowest inference time and minimal memory requirements, enabling real-time application and deployment in portable devices.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".