MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2958371845 · doi:10.11575/prism/35761

Real-time Pedestrian Classification System Using Deep Learning on a Raspberry Pi Cluster

2019· dissertation· en· W2958371845 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Zhaoyang Huang

Bibliographic record

VenuePRISM (University of Calgary) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVideo Surveillance and Tracking Methods
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersMitacsUniversity of Calgary
KeywordsRaspberry piCluster (spacecraft)Artificial intelligencePedestrianDeep learningComputer sciencePedestrian detectionCartographyGeographyOperating systemEmbedded systemInternet of ThingsArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Convolutional neural networks (CNN) are commonly used for object classification. However, CNN is computationally expensive and can have performance issues in real-time applications. The objective of this research is to overcome these disadvantages through efficient design, implementation and deployment of CNN on a Raspberry Pi (Rpi) cluster for real-time pedestrian classification. Through the feasibility test, by running CNN classification on one Rpi 3 Model B, the processing speed of approximately 1 FPS was obtained. This is far from the human reaction time requirement which is set to be less than 0.5 sec. In this thesis, two solutions are proposed. First, architectural design, implementation and experimentation with a cluster composed of 3 RPis to meet the two main requirements. Second, tweaking and optimizing the design of the CNN itself. Through the combination of the two solutions, we could achieve the near real-time classification performances which are 0.16 seconds per image, 79.46\% accuracy and false negative rate of the classification results is only 4.08\%.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.019

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePRISM (University of Calgary)Same topicVideo Surveillance and Tracking MethodsFrench-language works237,207