MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2958397769 · doi:10.1109/icc.2019.8762067

Smart Caching: Empower the Video Delivery for 5G-ICN Networks

2019· article· en· W2958397769 on OpenAlexaff
Zhe Zhang, Chung–Horng Lung, Marc St‐Hilaire, Ioannis Lambadaris

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCaching and Content Delivery
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer sciencePopularityQuality of experienceComputer networkNon-negative matrix factorizationFeature (linguistics)MultimediaMatrix decompositionQuality of service

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Since multimedia services will become fundamental in the upcoming 5G networks, how to improve the user quality of experience (QoE) is becoming a major challenge. In this paper, we integrate the concept of Information-Centric Networking (ICN) to the infrastructure of 5G networks. Due to the in-network caching feature of ICN, proactive caching can be beneficial in 5G networks. More precisely, this paper introduces a novel proactive caching approach (called smart caching) which leverages the non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) technique to predict the future ratings of user preferences on all videos for 5G-ICN networks. To solve the shortcoming of the NMF technique that generates inaccurate predictions for high rated but unpopular videos, we also take video historical popularity into consideration. Thus, the user future demands can be predicted based on the user preferences (i.e. the predicted ratings) and the historical popularity of videos. Simulation results show that the proposed smart caching outperforms existing approaches in terms of hit ratio, average video retrieval delay, and user satisfaction.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCaching and Content DeliveryFrench-language works237,207