MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2958544563 · doi:10.1287/ijoc.2018.0854

An Improved Branch-Cut-and-Price Algorithm for Parallel Machine Scheduling Problems

2019· article· en· W2958544563 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueINFORMS journal on computing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicScheduling and Optimization Algorithms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAlgorithmScheduling (production processes)Variable (mathematics)Mathematical optimizationMathematicsComputer scienceBranch and boundBranch and cutInteger programming

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work presents an improved branch-cut-and-price algorithm for the identical parallel machine scheduling problem minimizing a generic function of the job completion times. A new family of cuts is proposed to strengthen the arc-time-indexed formulation, along with an efficient separation algorithm. Also, the projection of the arc-time-indexed into a time-indexed formulation is introduced to take advantage of the variable fixings performed in the larger variable space. The improved algorithm was capable of solving 146 out of 150 instances in the literature, with 12 being solved for the first time. Also, the running time for the 134 previously solved instances decreased by 95.7% on the average.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.289
Threshold uncertainty score0.795

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it