Blood and Gill Carbonic Anhydrase in the Context of a Chondrichthyan Model of CO<sub>2</sub>Excretion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pacific spiny dogfish (Squalus suckleyi) have been widely used as a representative species for chondrichthyan CO2 excretion. Pacific spiny dogfish have a slower red blood cell (RBC) carbonic anhydrase (CA) isoform than teleost fishes, extracellular CA activity, no endogenous plasma CA inhibitor, and plasma-accessible CA IV at the gills. Thus, both the RBC and plasma compartments contribute to bicarbonate ion (HCO3−) dehydration at the gills for CO2 excretion in contrast to teleost fishes, in which HCO3− dehydration is restricted to RBCs. We compared CA activity levels, subcellular localization, and presence of plasma CA inhibitors in the blood and gills of 13 chondrichthyans to examine the hypothesis that the dogfish model of CO2 excretion applies broadly to chondrichthyans. In general, blood samples from the 12 other chondrichthyans examined had lower RBC CA activity than teleosts, some extracellular CA activity, and no endogenous plasma CA inhibitor. While type IV–like membrane-associated CA was found in the gills in all four of the chondrichthyans examined, S. suckleyi had three times more CA activity (183±13.2 μmol CO2 min−1 mg protein−1) in the microsomal (membrane) fraction of gills than the other three. In addition, unexpected variation in CA characteristics was observed between chondrichthyan species. Thus, in general, it appears that the pattern of CA distribution in fishes can be generally categorized as either chondrichthyan or teleost models. However, further studies should examine the functional significance of the within-chondrichthyan differences we observed and investigate whether CO2 excretion patterns exist along a continuum or in discrete groups.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".