MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2958743042 · doi:10.1101/701326

Augmented base pairing networks encode RNA-small molecule binding preferences

2019· preprint· en· W2958743042 on OpenAlexafffundabout

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicComputational Drug Discovery Methods
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité du Québec à MontréalMila - Quebec Artificial Intelligence Institute
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchGenome Canada
KeywordsENCODERepresentation (politics)Base pairRNABinding siteGraphRepertoireSmall moleculePairingPlasma protein binding

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A bstract Motivation The binding of small molecules to RNAs is an important mechanism which can stabilize 3D structures or activate key molecular functions. To date, computational and experimental efforts toward small molecule binding prediction have primarily focused on protein targets. Considering that a very large portion of the genome is transcribed into non-coding RNAs but only few regions are translated into proteins, successful annotations of RNA elements targeted by small-molecule would likely uncover a vast repertoire of biological pathways and possibly lead to new therapeutic avenues. Results Our work is a first attempt at bringing machine learning approaches to the problem of RNA drug discovery. RNAmigos takes advantage of the unique structural properties of RNA to predict small molecule ligands for unseen binding sites. A key feature of our model is an efficient representation of binding sites as augmented base pairing networks (ABPNs) aimed at encoding important structural patterns. We subject our ligand predictions to two virtual screen settings and show that we are able to rank the known ligand on average in the 73rd percentile, showing a significant improvement over several baselines. Furthermore, we observe that graphs which are augmented with non-Watson Crick (a.k.a non-canonical) base pairs are the only representation which is able to retrieve a significant signal, suggesting that non-canonical interactions are an necessary source of binding specificity in RNAs. We also find that an auxiliary graph representation task significantly boosts performance by providing efficient structural embeddings to the low data setting of ligand prediction. RNAmigos shows that RNA binding data contains structural patterns with potential for drug discovery, and provides methodological insights which can be applied to other structure-function learning tasks. Availability Code and data is freely available at http://csb.cs.mcgill.ca/RNAmigos . Contact jerome@cs.mcgill.ca

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicComputational Drug Discovery Methods→French-language works237,207→