Application of Homotopy to the Ageing Process of Human Body Within the Framework of Algebraic Topology
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the ageing process of the human body from the homotopy concept in the algebraic topology. The compact connected human body with boundary is assumed to be topologically equivalent to a cylinder. The complex connected cylindrical shape of the body x=S^1*I, described by the functions f,h: x→x is a Cartesian product of the vertical interval I=[0,β] and a circle S^1. The initial state of the body x=S^1*I is the topological shape of the infant. The ageing process called the homotopy is the family of continuous functions f_t(x) on the interval I=[0,α] where α>β and t≥β. It is an increasing sequence of the function f_t(x) of the body x=S^1*I. The homotopy relates the topological shape of the infant to the topological shape of the adult. The homology theory assigns to the human body (x) a sequence of abelian groups H_n(x) for n=0,1,2…and to the continuous function a sequence of homomorphism. The homology group characterizes the number and continuity of the compact surface of human body. The study excludes genetic, hormonal, environmental and other factors in the ageing process and recognizes the fact that ageing continues throughout life, through childhood, and adolescence into adulthood. Topologically the infant is equal to the adult since the infant continuously grows into the adult. The study found an algebraic way of relating homotopy to the process of ageing of human body. It was also established that this could offer other topologists useful topological tips in the application of homotopy to other physical continuous processes.    
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".