MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2958810300

Revolutionary Violence and the Encounter with the Other in Hubert Aquin’s Prochain épisode

2018· article· fr· W2958810300 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexandra Slavé

Bibliographic record

VenueDalhousie French Studies · 2018
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanismRhetoricPoliticsAmbivalenceAgency (philosophy)PhilosophySwiftAestheticsPsychoanalysisHumanitiesSociologyEpistemologyPolitical scienceLawPsychologyTheology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article establishes that Hubert Aquin produces in Prochain episode , by way of an ambivalent narrative voice, at once philosopher of revolutions and reluctant humanist, a distinctive portrayal of the Quebecois pursuit of cultural, political and individual independence, one that also explores the nature of ethical agency. As this essay argues, Prochain episode , interpreted as a pseudo-treatise on both the beguiling Cuban Revolution and on the nascent Quiet Revolution, creates a space where the humanism of Emmanuel Levinas interrupts, at intervals, the brutality of murderous acts and proto-nationalist rhetoric. This essay proposes an intersubjective reading of the Quebecois patriot’s unsuccessful revolutionary project. The protagonist demonstrates that he possesses a sense of the ethical when, in the instances of facing the Other, he understands the exigency of the Face, and responds to its call by refusing murderous acts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.618
Threshold uncertainty score0.768

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0320.040
Scholarly communication0.0070.003
Open science0.0010.005
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.227
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDalhousie French StudiesSame topicHistorical Studies and Socio-cultural AnalysisFrench-language works237,207